AMD A10-6700 vs A10-6800K Processor: Overview/ Unlock Multiplier/ is it good for gaming / Benchmark/ Overclocking/ Specification (Specs) – AMD continues to release new processors for old architecture. Thus, the corporation postpones the release of fresh solutions on a modern technical process. IN graphic segment the situation is identical. But autumn is coming, and we have hope for the long-awaited announcements, because users want to see more productive devices on the market.
The A10-6700 and A10-6800K CPUs can’t compete with Intel’s solutions when it comes to physical core performance.
The chips reviewed in this article (the “Richland” family) are a logical continuation of the AMD A10 hybrid lineup. These models are practically no different from previous 5000-series CPUs (eg A10-5800K).
Watch This Before Buying an AMD A10-6800K
he A10-6800K could have been fantastic, and it’s aged well enough to become fantastic, but only time, overclocking and benchmarks can answer that for certain. Join me as I take a look back at one of AMD’s most popular APUs of all time, the A10-6800K.
stones AMD A10-6700 and A10-6800K are compatible with Socket FM2. The first microprocessor is equipped with four physical cores (nominal frequency – 3700 MHz, L2 cache – 4 MB). The maximum supported memory standard is DDR3-1866. Surprisingly, the TDP of the A10-6700 does not exceed 65 W (not bad, considering that in mode turbo this CPU operates at 4300 MHz).
AMD A10-6700 and GTX 1050 Ti benchmarked in 2021
Can you turn an old computer into a budget gaming PC by adding a new GPU to it? Well, in this video I’ll be trying it out by adding a GTX 1050 Ti to an old Asus prebuilt with an A10-6700 and then benchmarking it in some modern games. Everything was recorded with Nvidia ShadowPlay.
AMD A10-6700 vs A10-6800K Processor: Specification (Specs)
AMD A10-6700 and A10-6800K have the same graphics – HD 8670D. In the asset adapter 384 computing unitthe nominal core clock frequency is 844 MHz.
|Technical process||32 nm||32 nm||32 nm||32 nm|
|Kernels / threads||2/2||4/4||4/4||4/4|
|Clock frequency||3600/3800 MHz||3800/4200 MHz||3700/4300 MHz||4100/4400 MHz|
|L3 cache||1 MB||4 MB||4 MB||4 MB|
|TDP||65 W||100 W||65 W||100 W|
|Graphics||Radeon HD 7540D||Radeon HD 7660D||Radeon HD 8670D||Radeon HD 8670D|
The A10-6800K variant boasts support for faster RAM (DDR3-2133), an unlocked multiplier (do not forget about the letter “K” in the name), as well as an impressive clock speed of 4100/4400 MHz. TDP older brother – 100 W.
AMD A10-6700 vs A10-6800K Processor: Test stand
Motherboard – ECS A55F2-M3
RAM – G.Skill RipjawsX F3-12800CL10D-16GBXL
AMD A10-6700 vs A10-6800K: Performance and test results
The performance of the AMD 6000 series of processors has increased compared to its predecessors (CPU 5000th series), but only in relation to physical nuclei. Integrated graphics impressed less.
AMD A10-6700 and A10-6800K have the same graphics – HD 8670D.
The AMD A10-6700 and A10-6800K lose almost twice as much to the A10-5800K in 3D benchmarks.
It is possible that the matter lies on the motherboard. At the top basis with a high-end chipset, the situation may be quite different, although there are no guarantees (the situation is strange anyway).
AMD A10-6800K easily overclocked to 4800 MHz and even started at 5 GHz (but this is already an unstable result).
The A10-6700 and A10-6800K CPUs can’t compete with Intel’s (even entry-level) solutions when it comes to physical core performance. AMD developers urgently need to change something and improve the architecture. The situation cannot be improved by increasing the number of threads and clock frequency, and the 32 nm process technology has long exhausted its potential. Keywords: AMD