filtered the first performance data

filtered the first performance data

The 10 nm For laptops, they have been a reality for months, to the point that these processors are the lucky ones to include Ice Lake. Until now, there have been certain rumors and some leaks that have shown some little relevant data in terms of scores, where nothing interesting was revealed beyond the placeholder.

But today we finally have data that are as interesting as competent what can you do Tiger Lake-U versus Comet Lake-U and especially to Ice lake-u?

More with less: this is how Tiger Lake-U presents itself

Remember that we are talking about processors for laptops with an established TDP between 15 to 25 watts, so the frequencies are always going to be reduced and the number of cores too.

Read This Now:   MSI lowered the prices of the GeForce RTX 3000, and the competition is getting more and more expensive

That said, the first and most interesting thing is that we start from a configuration of 4 cores and 8 threads at a frequency of just 1.2 GHz, nothing remarkable we could think, especially since two markers of what appears to be the same engineering sample have been found, and therefore each one has its corresponding score.

Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench_2 "width =" 1000 "height =" 1360 "srcset =" https://www.bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/1577492775_31_filtered-the-first-performance-data.jpg 1000w, https://hardzone.es/app/uploads-hardzone.es/2019/12/Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench_2-221x300.jpg 221w, https://hardzone.es/app/uploads-hardzone.es /2019/12/Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench_2-753x1024.jpg 753w, https://hardzone.es/app/uploads-hardzone.es/2019/12/Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench_2-768x1044.jpg 768w "sizes =" (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px "/></p>
<p>In previous leaks we already deduced that, apparently and as expected, seeing the Intel roadmap, there would be changes in the cache system. This system points to figures unknown until now in the blues: <strong>3 MB of L3 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core</strong>, only this way the filtered thing is understood.</p>
<p>Therefore and if this is correct, the chip that we are going to see next has the unusual figure of <strong>5 MB of L2 and 12 MB of L3</strong> for a Quad Core. That said, it is really surprising that the scores offered in both single thread and multi thread are the ones that we are going to see next, because without a doubt they manage to make less performance with less.</p><div class=

Superior to Comet Lake and very close to Ice Lake less frequently

Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench "width =" 1000 "height =" 1359 "srcset =" https://www.bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/1577492775_227_filtered-the-first-performance-data.jpg 1000w, https://hardzone.es/app/uploads-hardzone.es/2019/12/Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench-221x300.jpg 221w, https://hardzone.es/app/uploads-hardzone.es /2019/12/Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench-753x1024.jpg 753w, https://hardzone.es/app/uploads-hardzone.es/2019/12/Intel-Tiger-Lake-CPU_Geekbench-768x1044.jpg 768w "sizes =" (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px "/></p>
<p>The data is really surprising, since in single thread they have been achieved <strong>1189 and 1162</strong> points respectively and in multi thread <strong>4274 and 4047</strong>. Ice Lake-U gets with an i7-1065G7 ones <strong>1233 and 4757</strong> points to same cores and 1.5 GHz, while Comet Lake-U with an i7-10710U at 1.6 GHz and 14 nm ++ achieves <strong>1110 points and 4249</strong> with 6 cores and 12 threads.</p>
<table id=

CPU
Intel Ice Lake-U Core i7-1065G7
Intel Tiger Lake-U (Configuration 1)
Intel Tiger Lake-U (Configuration 2)
Intel Comet Lake-U Core i7-10710U
Intel Ice Lake-Y

Process node
10nm +
10nm ++
10nm ++
14nm +++
10nm +

Cores / threads
4/8
4/8
4/8
6/12
4/8

Base clock
1.50 GHz
1.20 GHz
1.20 GHz
1.60 GHz
1.20 GHz

Single core score
1233
1189
1162
1110
146

Multicore Score
4757
4274
4047
4249
529

If we consider that the Tiger Lake-U is a 4/8 at 1.2 GHz, it can be said that with two cores less it manages to beat the Comet Lake-U and that with 300 MHz less it is very close to the Ice Lake-U at the same nanometers.

Read This Now:   5

Therefore, we are facing what could be a quite large jump in IPC performance, since between IL-U and TL-U there is a 20% frequency, but only a 3.56% of difference to a core and a 10.15% in multi thread. No doubt Intel is hiding something, since this data reflects much improvement in such a short time, will Willow Cove be better than expected?


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420