Categories: Graphic cards

AMD confirms problems with rendering times – promises cure and improvement

At the end of last year, the technology site Techreport published several investigative articles on the rendering times of modern graphics cards from the Geforce and Radeon series. Larger variations are experienced as microscopic delays or jerks in the image, which impairs the gaming experience. AMD pulled the shortest straw and now the graphics card maker confirms that the problem exists.

In the Beyond3D forum, David Beumann writes on AMD that the driver developers are aware that there are errors in the Catalyst drivers that can cause uneven rendering times for certain game titles. In Borderlands 2, for example, it is believed that the whole thing is caused by incorrect buffer sizes, which must be corrected with new drivers.

Additionally, when we switched from the old VLIW architecture to the GCN core there was a significant updates to all parts of the driver was needed – although not really spoken about the entire memory management on GCN is different to prior GPU’s and the initial software management for that was primarily driven by schedule and in the meantime we’ve been rewriting it again and we have discovered that the new version has also improved frame latency in a number of cases so we are accelerating the QA and implementation of that.

More alarming, however, is that AMD has not yet managed to squeeze all the peculiarities of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture, despite the fact that these circuits have been on the market for more than a year. Beumann writes that GCN has completely new memory management compared to the VLIW-based predecessors, but that the development of the drivers was “driven by the schedule”.

Since its launch, however, programmers have devoted more time to the news in GCN and discovered that newer versions of memory management software improve latencies. According to Beumann, AMD is now focusing on implementing these improvements in the Catalyst driver package. However, when new, improved drivers may be available is not revealed by the correspondence.

Source: Techreport.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420