Categories: News

Browser Privacy – Brave Drops Off!

Trinity College Dublin’s President of Computer Systems Dr. Douglas Leith has published a study on the privacy of browsers. He compared Brave, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Microsoft Edge and Yandex in terms of the amount of personal data they transmit to backend servers. The conclusion of the study was that Brave is by far the most efficient browser regarding the protection of personal data.

The study shows:

“Used with its default settings, Brave is by far the most private of the browsers studied. We did not find any use of identifiers that would allow IP tracking over time and no distribution of the details of web pages visited with backend servers. “

Browser privacy

Dr. Leith has also ranked the most popular browsers according to how they distribute their personal information. Brave ranks first in the privacy category, followed by Chrome, Firefox and Safari.

All three browsers have “browser-logged identifiers,” which persist even when the browser is restarted. The only way they can be removed is by re-installation.

Edge and Yandex were ranked last, as both browsers have persistent hardware identifiers that cannot be revoked or reinstalled. The verdict for these is worrying:

“Both send identifiers that are connected to the hardware of the device and thus persist even when the browser is reinstalled. Edge sends the hardware UUID of the device to Microsoft. Similarly, Yandex transmits a hash of the hardware serial number and MAC address to the back-end servers. Our analysis reveals that this behavior cannot be disabled by users. “

According to recent statistics, the most used desktop browser is Chrome, with a market share of 67%, followed by Firefox, Safari, Edge, Internet Exporer and Opera.

Brave currently has 8.7 million daily users, according to statistics published by the company.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420