Categories: News

Private blockchains have been full of developers for three years

The main permissible blockchain protocols (besu, Corda, Fabric, MultiChain, Quorum and Sawtooth) attract an increasing number of developers due to the development of projects of private blockchains in the business.

Different actors, like ConsenSys, hope to convince companies to adopt public blockchain networks or encourage interoperability between private and public blockchain. Today, however, companies continue to favor private environments for their applications. And several blockchain protocols, like besu, Corda or Quorum, allow them.

This corporate preference for private blockchain can be seen in the rise in number of developers involved in the development of these open source protocols. According to a study by Chainstack, the number of these developers has increased 12-fold in the space of three years.

More dynamic blockchain communities

Two technologies are nevertheless essential among the blockchain industry, namely Fabric and Corda, which "represent an important part of all activities", especially in terms of contributions to the open source code. Notable differences persist, however.

Fabric, for example, has a much larger developer network that interacts with its repository to a much lesser degree, while Corda has fewer but very active developers, "notes Chainstack.

Indeed, the community Hyperledger Fabric has 17,561 active contributors, compared to 5,678 for Corda. On the other hand, the number of contributions to Corda reached 30,382 over the period, almost three times more than for Fabric (12,439).

Contribution does not rhyme with maturity or adoption

But the study also allows us to understand that the sustainability of some protocols of permissible blockchains is not yet insured. Sawtooth is for example marked by a peak in activity from the 4th quarter of 2018 to the first quarter of 2019. This period is however followed by a sharp decrease in the number of developers and their contributions during the year 2019.

Enterprise blockchain development is still a nascent and evolving universe within the broader framework of software development, ”said the study authors.

They also warn that these developer activity indicators are not a guarantee of technology maturity or of its adoption.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420