Categories: News

The carbon footprint of a Bitcoin transaction would represent 780,650 Visa transactions

A transaction Bitcoin would consume the same amount ofelectricity than a British household for almost two months.

In any case, that’s what Alex de Vries, blockchain specialist at PWC, sure TheTelegraph. According to him, at its highest, the first cryptocurrency of the market consumes as muchelectricity that the Chile.

The carbon footprint of a single transaction is the same as 780,650 Visa transactions or 52,043 hours spent watching YouTube, "he said.

To work, Bitcoin uses a Proof of Work validation system which puts network participants in competition. These – the minors – must deploy computer power in order to win rewards in bitcoins. They mainly use dedicated machines called ASICs. This industry today would weigh more than 4 billion euros.

What is shocking is that the average lifespan of a bitcoin mining machine is one and a half years, "added De Vries.

The ASICs are quickly obsolete and would create “a mountain of electronic waste that is difficult to recycle”. According to figures provided by De Vries, the bitcoin mining produces 10.71 kilotons of electronic waste each year, almost the same quantity as that produced by Luxembourg.

In order to reduce their ecological footprint, more and more minors announce that they are turning to renewable energies. However, environmental protection organizations warn that manycrypto-mining infrastructure buy today from coal factory.

The waste of energy overflowing with Bitcoin has become an even more serious problem as many facilities are located in regions with coal energy. This is not only a problem with blockchain technologies, but also a broader challenge for the future of the Internet, "said Andrew Hatton, chief technology officer at Greenpeace UK.

Other cryptocurrencies use much less energy-consuming validation systems, including Proof of Stake. The second cryptocurrency on the market, Ethereum, is considering abandoning the Proof of Work in favor of this method.

According to other experts, the figures provided by De Vries are generally bloated and dependent against this industry.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420