Categories: Graphic cards

Intel orders “Ponte Vecchio” at 6 nanometers from TSMC

Generation two of Intel’s upcoming graphics family Xe goes by the code name “Ponte Vecchio”, and was intended to be the company’s first circuit in its 7 nanometer manufacturing process. As early as last spring, however, rumors emerged that the company was considering something previously unthinkable – to place part of its production with the contract manufacturer TSMC. Now the rumors seem to turn into reality, where Intel chooses the N6P process at 6 nanometers.

According to Digitimes (via Wccftech) and China Times, Intel has now booked capacity for the production of as many as 180,000 silicon wafers with Xe circuits in the Ponte Vecchio family. Earlier rumors about 5 and 3 nanometer processor manufacturing are also highlighted in the reports and translated by “RetiredEngineer”, chiakokhua. Here, Xe at 6 nanometers is described as a soft start, with small volumes.

If the sources prove to be true, TSMC would benefit greatly from Intel’s manufacturing problems in the latter half of 2022, as the company’s own concerns painted the company into a corner. Even Intel’s entire graphics investment can stand and weigh with the launch of just Ponte Vecchio, while processor production at TSMC of 5 and 3 nanometers is likely to get rid of regardless. In addition, TSMC is the most likely candidate for Intel’s emergency solution in the near future: to outsource 7 nanometer processor manufacturing.

TSMC’s 6-nanometer process N6P corresponds in round slings to Intel’s own next second generation “10 nm +”, where contract manufacturing is intended to free up more space in Intel’s factories for more complex CPU manufacturing. Previously, Intel has said that its production of 5 nanometers will take the lead in 2023, but with its delays of 7 nanometers, it remains to be seen.

Unlike Intel, the Taiwanese contract manufacturer appears to be in the process of manufacturing its next-generation processes, where in TSMC languages ​​they are called 4 and 3 nanometers during the latter half of 2022.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420