Categories: Gaming

This is what God of War looks like on the Steam Deck compared to the PlayStation 5/4

God of War not only landed this year on PC, but thanks to the Steam Deck we have the only portable platform with which to truly be able to play this title to a decent graphic quality that does not have much to envy to the consoles. An example of this brings them to us ‘The Bit Analyst‘, who wanted to compare the visual quality, performance and loading times of this title optimized for Valve’s portable console against PlayStation consoles.

In summary form, the Steam Deck is the one that offers the shortest loading times, And it is that the PlayStation 5 is limited to running the PlayStation 4 game for backward compatibility, so all its hardware is not used. This also means that in some areas of the game, the portable console can offer greater drawing distances Regarding the console version, while in terms of visual quality in general terms, it is basically slightly superior to that of the PlayStation 4 version, and that is to dream of the power of PlayStation 5 on a portable console, at least for now, it is unthinkable.

Of course, not everything is good news, and it is really there is no possible way to get the game to run “acceptably” at 60 FPSeven with minimum graphics settings and AMD FidelifyFX Super Resolution technology, technology that is not recommended to useat least in the portable mode of the console, since it is only profitable when connected to an external monitor in Maximum Quality mode to play at 1080p at an acceptable framerate as well as stable.

In short, at least with God of War, it is as if we had a console superior to the PlayStation 4 with which we can enjoy games anywhere, and is that laptops are not comparable (not only because of the differences in size), and it is necessary to remember that if they are not connected to the electrical network, the performance drops noticeably.

Miners Hashrate

Share
Published by
Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420