Perhaps the biggest cryptocurrency, bitcoin, is most often criticized for the high consumption of its network, which is powered by miners and computers around the world. A group of climate activists, led by Greenpeace, which recently launched a new campaign to “change the bitcoin’s code”, recently added to this criticism. Bloomberg.
The debate on high bitcoin consumption is perhaps the most at the beginning of last year started by billionaire Elon Muskwhich due to the environmental burden of cryptocurrencies in May unexpectedly announced that Tesla would stop accepting bitcoin payments.
After almost a year, however, no major changes took place and bitcoin according to data from Cambridge University, which regularly updates its metrics, consumes more energy per year than some entire countries, including Slovakia, the Czech Republic, but also Sweden.
Read also
From mud to pool. The EU is aiming for one of the basic characteristics of cryptocurrencies, people will revolt
The group of climate activists and Greenpeace therefore launched at the end of March campaign called “Change the Code Not the Climate”, which calls for a change in the way bitcoins are mined to reduce its carbon footprint.
The bitcoin network is currently built on the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm, which forces miners to “wrestle” in calculating complex calculations through which they group transactions grouped into blocks into a publicly available chain (blockchain).
This system is currently used by the second largest cryptocurrency ether, but it has been preparing for a full move to the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) protocol, which is due to take place in the second half of this year.
It is Ethereum that believes that a complete transition to PoS will reduce the energy consumption of its network by up to 99%, which activists would welcome even the largest bitcoin. Billionaire Chris Larsen, who is one of the creators of the campaign and the founder of Ripple, claims that bitcoin should be so-called. “Soft forks” or “hard forks”, the first of which would implement the code changes directly into the old blockchain, while the hard fork, according to Larsen, would split the bitcoin into two separate networks. One could stay on Proof-of-Work and support the miners, and the other would work on a “cleaner” protocol.
America’s largest oil producer is already burning natural gas and extracting bitcoin
The largest bitcoin mining is currently taking place in the United States, where many companies and miners have moved after last year’s mining ban in China. Campaign Director Michael Brune for The Guardian he said that some old coal-fired or gas-fired power plants have even reopened in the country, which satisfy the consumption for cryptocurrency mining.
According to Brunei, the transfer of bitcoin mining to renewable energy sources is not the starting point either. According to him, their share in the total extraction is minimal and without major changes in the code, bitcoin will still be a cryptocurrency, which requires maximum energy use.
The campaigners are even planning to take legal action against the new mass mining sites and are on their side to convince the biggest investors and bitcoin supporters who could help them change the cryptocurrency code.
Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…
Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…
Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…
Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…
Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…
In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…
This website uses cookies.