Categories: Technology

Millions of car remote controls at risk for a security problem: Hyundai, Toyota, Kia and Tesla involved

A study conducted jointly by KU Leuven in Belgium and the University of Birmingham has revealed a serious flaw in the implementation of cryptographic measures within millions of car remote controls produced by Toyota, Hyundai, Kia and Tesla which makes them vulnerable to sabotage, increasing the risk of theft.

The problem attributable to the implementation that was made cryptographic system Texas Instruments DST80 inside car remote controls and which would allow a hacker to exploit a relatively inexpensive RFID device close to the remote control to intercept communications and clone it, thus being able to disable the car's immobilizer system. Once you have stepped over this bank, it would be sufficient to tamper with the ignition lock of the car to start the engine, with the "usual" techniques often portrayed in films and TV series.

The method requires that the attacker be in close proximity to the remote control in order to be able to scan it via an RFID device. In this way it is possible to obtain enough information to determine the encryption key, clone it using the same RFID device and use it in turn to disable the car's security measures.

The attack is possible because the encryption keys used by the cars involved were easily discovered by performing a reverse engineering operation on the firmware. In the case of Toyota, for example, the encryption keys were based on a serial number that was also transmitted with the remote control signal, while for Kia and Hyundai 24-bit randomly generated are used (but DST80 and supports up to 80 , hence the name): Professor Flavio Garcia of the University of Birmingham notes that "guess" the correct 24 bits a rather trivial matter. However, researchers did not divulge precise information on how encryption was hacked.

The researchers published a list of the cars involved in their study, but specified that the list is not exhaustive, thus suggesting the possibility that the problem may also affect other car models.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420