Categories: Geforce GTX

GTX 1050 2GT VS RX 560 Hashrate: Overclocking | Settings (Shocking)

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 2GT VS RX 560 Hashrate: Overclocking | Best Settings : The RX 560 in my previous review clearly proved that paying extra for a better graphics card when buying a cheap gaming computer is definitely worth it. However, there is another graphics card, which costs approximately . This GTX 1050 is very popular. It does not cost much money, has very good and quiet cooling and has a decent level of processing. How to deal with the RX 560? Read more ..


Specifications

Graphics card description and phot

The graphics card measures 215 x 112 x 38 mm and occupies two slots. Unlike most RX 560s, it does not require any additional power supply, but I would like to see it on this card. The card is a bit bothered by throttling caused by the consumption limit. The outputs are taken care of by 1x HDMI, 1x DVI and 1x DP. The core is cooled by a large heatsink on which two silent 80mm fans blow. 

VRM has no liabilities, MSI relies only on a fan that blows on MOSFETs. However, I did not encounter any overheating, so I do not see this as a major problem. VRM consists of three phases for the kernel and one phase in charge of memory. 

For the GTX 1050, this VRM is quite sufficient. It is even slightly better than the cheapest cards from PALIT and Gainward. The fans always run at least 45% and cannot be switched off. The card can monitor the speed of the fans, but they are completely silent even when playing. Photos from my computer are a good example of poor cable management. Please ignore the HDD that holds only one screw.


Test set and testing methodology

  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (thank you for lending MSI)
  • RAM: Patriot Signature 2×8 GB @ 2933 MHz
  • Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO
  • Graphics card: MSI GeForce GTX 1050 2GT OC
  • System SSD: Western Digital Green 240GB M2
  • Gaming SSD: 2x Crucial BX200 240 GB + Kingston Fury 120 GB RAID 0
  • Source: EVGA 750 G2
  • Case: Zalman R1
  • CPU cooling: Arctic Liquid Freezer 360
  • Monitor: LG 25UM57-P (2560×1080, I tested at 1920×1080 resolution)

Driver: ForceWare 382.53, Crimson 17.6.2

OS : Windows 10, build 15063.413
I measured FPS using Fraps. I only tested at low details and a resolution of 1920×1080.


Game results















Benchmarks


Overclocking, consumption, temperatures

When I launched the GPU-Z, I was glad that this piece has Samsung’s memory. So I overclocked them from 7 GHz to 9 GHz without any problems. They should be able to handle up to 9.4 GHz, but Afterburner won’t let me go to higher values ​​and I don’t want to do any crazy with a borrowed card. I overclocked the core from + – 1800 MHz to approximately 1890 MHz. In the Unigine Valley, the card received a beautiful 1778 points. Performance therefore increased by approximately 15%. Graphics like the HD 7950 or GTX 670 from 2012 have similar performance, but up to 4x higher consumption. The GTX 1050 is great, but if you get a piece that doesn’t have Samsung’s memory, it freezes a bit, because you happen to lose a few percent of performance if you decide to overclock the card.

Consumption of GTX 1050 is slightly lower than RX 560, when playing more demanding games it will say about 20W less.

The cooler of this card pleased me. The card looks good with it, is very quiet and the card has low temperatures. At rest, the core has about 30 ° C, while playing games, the core temperature has climbed to only 58 ° C and the card is very quiet. A huge difference compared to the RX 560 from Sapphire.


The GTX 1050 often has significantly higher performance than the RX 560, consumes less power, closes better, and perhaps every model has sufficient and quiet cooling. The RX 560 should have a lower price, as the GTX 1050 has the same price and is simply better.

Pros

  • Decent performance
  • Low power consumption and temperature, minimal noise
  • No additional power required
  • Ansel, Shadowplay
  • Better price / performance ratio than RX 560

Cons

  • Graphics with 2GB of memory have poor prospects for the future


The best graphics card for low budget players

Acknowledgments Thank

you very much for reading my article! I hope I helped you at least a little when deciding to buy your new graphics card. If you liked the article, you can support me with liking on FB and subscribing to YT.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420