Categories: Hardware

Sapphire doubles the memory of the Radeon RX 6500 XT: here is a Pulse with 8GB of VRAM

Sapphire doubles the memory of the Radeon RX 6500 XT: here is a Pulse with 8GB of VRAM

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the lowest-end card of the current generation, AMD’s attempt to offer a new RDNA 2 GPU (originally meant for notebooks) and place it at a more affordable price level than the crazy prices that prevailed until the beginning of this year.

We, like other magazines, found ourselves rejecting it for the reduced performance especially on the PCI Express 3.0 platforms, widely diffused and natural habitat of a model aimed at gamers on a tight budget. a PCI Express 4.0 x4 interfacewhile on board we find 4GB of memory GDDR6 su bus a 64 bit.

These three specifications, put together, impact the performance of the RX 6500 XT noticeably when installed on a system with a PCIe 3.0 slot because the standard halves the available bandwidth. In addition, the small amount of VRAM memory could not compensate for this behavior.

Finally, at least on paper, there seems to be a partial solution to the asphyxiated performance of AMD’s solution: equipping it with 8GB of memory. Sapphire has announced a variant with the double the VRAM memory of its custom Pulse implementation. We don’t know if other realities will follow, but it could be a way for AMD and its partners to “take out” excess GDDR6 chips and GPUs.

The newcomer is factory overclocked to 2695 MHz for the Game Clock and 2855 MHz for the Boost Clock, frequencies of 10 and 30 MHz higher than the 4GB Pulse model, already overclocked at the factory. The rest of the spec is unchanged, so we have 1024 stream processors, 16 Ray Accelerators and 32 ROPs.

Doubling the memory probably will not completely solve the performance deficit found using the 4GB card on the PCIe 3.0 platform, however it should have some effect and above all allow the 6500 XT to play modern titles smoothly: 4GB of memory is now very few, some games don’t even start with that amount of memory. And to say that AMD was the first to say it clearly, only to back down.



Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420