–Before AMD’s new generation of satnavs, BitcoinMinersHashrate revised the graphics card test course with new benchmarks, measurements and methods. Both the benchmarks and the other measurements show minor shifts compared to the old course. Savegames provide more transparency.
The graphics card test course used by BitcoinMinersHashrate to the end has had its day. Its base was now one and a half years old. In mid-2018 there was a minor update for Nvidia’s Turing series, but in total too much has happened: Windows 10 has evolved, the graphics card drivers from AMD and Nvidia have evolved and – most importantly – there are numerous new ones Games appeared. So it is high time to start all over again – just in time for the launch of AMD Navi announced for the third quarter.
An overview of the innovations
One of the most important changes is not to be found on the test course itself, but in the transparency of the processes. The article graphics card tests: methodology, settings and savegames was therefore not only updated, but also extensively expanded so that the hardware currently in use and the other tests for volume and power consumption measurement are explained in more detail. In addition, the test sequence can be seen for the first time in the video for each individual game and, if the game allows, a savegame of the scene is also available for download.
Any reader who wants can use it to create their own precise overview of the benchmark, or to compare their system with the measurement values of the editorial team – just as it was the last time in the community game benchmark tests ,
To the test system in a nutshell: The Core i9-9900K (test) uses a new processor, but it now comes without overclocking. From now on, the Phantek Enthoo Evolv X housing also provides ventilation during the tests. Windows 10 1903 is used with new graphics card drivers. New games are being used as a load scenario for volume, power consumption and temperature. The difficulty level is increased for the frametime measurements and from now on the 99.8th percentile is used. And with two exceptions, all AAA games were exchanged for new representatives of their kind.
From now on, only the new test course will be used for graphics card tests. On the following two pages you will find all the benchmarks and measurement values that have been created so far, which will be used for future evaluations.
Graphics card benchmarks in 1,920 × 1,080
The GeForce GTX 1080, the GeForce RTX 2070 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 can be compared very well, since all three products work in a comparable performance class and therefore come with the same memory configuration, but are based on different architectures. An interpretation of the results and a comparison to the old test course should therefore be carried out on these three models as an example.
In 1,920 × 1,080, the Radeon RX Vega 64 and the GeForce GTX 1080 deliver a head-to-head duel in the pictures per second. In the end, the AMD graphics card delivers one percent more FPS. The GeForce RTX 2070 is then seven percent ahead. This corresponds to the previously known picture.
To edit
Performance rating – 1,920 × 1,080
Inflowing diagrams All No
Anno 1800 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Anthem – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Battlefield V – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Dirt Rally 2.0 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
F1 2018 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Far Cry New Dawn – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Hitman 2 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Just Cause 4 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Metro Exodus – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Rage 2 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Resident Evil 2 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
The Division 2 – 1,920 × 1,080: FPS, average
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 FE
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 FE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 570
To edit
Rating – 99.8th percentile (frame times in FPS), 1,920 × 1,080
Inflowing diagrams All No
Anno 1800 – 1,920 × 1,080: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Anthem – 1,920 × 1,080: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 1,920 × 1,080: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
The Division 2 – 1,920 × 1,080: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 FE
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 FE
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 590
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 570
The frame times are different than the FPS
In the frame times, however, the picture changes a bit – caused by the 99.8th percentile instead of the 99.0th percentile used so far. In this series of measurements, all three graphics cards move closer together and only differ by three percent. The GeForce GTX 1080 is again in third place. The GeForce RTX 2070 only makes it to second place and delivers three percent better frame times than the Pascal predecessor. The Radeon RX Vega 64, on the other hand, makes it to the top, but is only less than one percent ahead.
The individual games show enormous outliers
Regardless of the resolution, it is worth taking a look at the individual games, because there are sometimes very large outliers that prefer either AMD or Nvidia graphics cards. In Anno 1800, for example, Nvidia graphics cards are significantly faster than the AMD counterparts. The Radeon VII just makes it to the level of the GeForce RTX 2070. The situation is similar in Hitman 2, which runs just as clearly faster with the GeForce accelerator.
Likewise, there are also games that cope better with a Radeon. AMD products work very well in Battlefield V, especially the frame times in Full HD are clearly superior to the competition. The same applies to Dirt Rally 2.0.
There are also games that prefer one manufacturer, but still run properly on the other. This applies, among other things, to Just Cause 4, which works slightly better on GeForce graphics cards, while Far Cry New Dawn works well with Radeon accelerators.
In 2,560 × 1,440 there are only minimal shifts in the frame rate. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is again one percent faster than the GeForce GTX 1080. The GeForce RTX 2070 can then extend the lead by one percent to eight over the Radeon.
To edit
Performance rating – 2,560 × 1,440
Inflowing diagrams All No
Anno 1800 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Anthem – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Battlefield V – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Dirt Rally 2.0 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
F1 2018 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Far Cry New Dawn – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Hitman 2 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Just Cause 4 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Metro Exodus – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Rage 2 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Resident Evil 2 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
The Division 2 – 2,560 × 1,440: FPS, average
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 FE
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 FE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
To edit
Rating – 99.8th percentile (frame times in FPS), 2,560 × 1,440
Inflowing diagrams All No
Anno 1800 – 2,560 × 1,440: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Anthem – 2,560 × 1,440: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 2,560 × 1,440: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
The Division 2 – 2,560 × 1,440: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 FE
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 FE
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
In the frame times, on the other hand, something more is happening. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is again three percent better than the GeForce GTX 1080 in this series of measurements. However, the GeForce RTX 2070 can outperform with four percent.
There are larger shifts in Ultra HD. With so many pixels to calculate, the Radeon RX Vega 64 delivers an average of five percent more FPS than the GeForce GTX 1080. And the GeForce RTX 2070 does the job seven percent faster than the Radeon. This increases the difference between the GeForce GTX 1080 and the GeForce RTX 2070 from eight percent (1,920 × 1,080) to twelve percent (3,840 × 2,160).
To edit
Performance rating – 3,840 × 2,160
Inflowing diagrams All No
Anno 1800 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Anthem – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Battlefield V – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Dirt Rally 2.0 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
F1 2018 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Far Cry New Dawn – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Hitman 2 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Just Cause 4 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Metro Exodus – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Rage 2 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Resident Evil 2 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
The Division 2 – 3,840 × 2,160: FPS, average
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 FE
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
To edit
Rating – 99.8th percentile (frame times in FPS), 3,840 × 2,160
Inflowing diagrams All No
Anno 1800 – 3,840 × 2,160: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Anthem – 3,840 × 2,160: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 3,840 × 2,160: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
The Division 2 – 3,840 × 2,160: 99.8th percentile (Frametimes in FPS)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 FE
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
There are also major jumps in frame times. In Ultra HD, the Radeon RX Vega 64 can extend the lead over the GeForce GTX 1080 by four percent. And the GeForce RTX 2070 does the same compared to the AMD accelerator and delivers an average of eight percent better frame times.
New test course against old course – the differences
If you compare the performance ratings of the old with those of the new test course, there are only minor differences in the FPS. Representatives of the Pascal generation in particular do somewhat worse. For example, the Radeon RX Vega 64 in the new course is a little faster than the GeForce GTX 1080, in the old course this was only true for Ultra HD. It is obvious that this is due to Pascal rather than Vega, because the GeForce RTX 2070 is slightly better than its predecessor, while the distance between the GeForce RTX 2070 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 has remained virtually the same on average.
The differences between the new and the old test course for FPS
The differences in frame times are somewhat larger, with the biggest differences being in Ultra HD. Even in the lower resolutions, the Radeon RX Vega 64 does slightly better in the new course, practically nothing changes with the two Nvidia graphics cards.
In 3840 × 2.160 the GeForce GTX 1080 is a small loser, four instead of one percent has to put it back compared to the Radeon RX Vega. The GeForce RTX 2070 could only outperform the old test system by seven percent. With the new, however, it is 13 percent. Accordingly, the Turing graphics card was able to extend the distance to Vega.
The differences between the new and the old test course for frame times
Esports & multiplayer games (Apex Legends, Fortnite and Co.) in the benchmark
As usual, the “benchmark world” looks a bit different in the usual esports games than in the AAA games. The differences in frame rates are limited and differ only slightly. On average from Apex Legends, Fortnite, Overwatch and Rainbow Six: Siege, the GeForce GTX 1080 in Full HD delivers two percent more FPS than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and the GeForce RTX 2070 is another eight percent faster. In WQHD, the Pascal graphics card is five percent faster and the Turing graphics card is another eight percent faster than the Vega model. In Ultra HD, the Radeon RX Vega 64 then crawls back to the GeForce GTX 1080, whose distance to the GeForce RTX 2070 increases to nine percent.
To edit
Rating Esports games (FPS) – 1,920 × 1,080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 570
To edit
Rating Esports games (FPS) – 2,560 × 1,440
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
To edit
Rating Esports games (FPS) – 3,840 × 2,160
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
To edit
Rating Esports Games – 99.8th Percentile Frametimes, 1,920 × 1,080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 590
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 570
To edit
Rating Esports Games – 99.8th Percentile Frametimes, 2,560 × 1,440
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
To edit
Rating Esports Games – 99.8th Percentile Frametimes, 3,840 × 2,160
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
The differences in frame times are comparable. In 1,920 × 1,080, the GeForce GTX 1080 delivers an average of three percent better frame times than the Radeon RX Vega 64, the GeForce RTX 2070 is another seven percent faster. The measurements are similar in 2,560 × 1,440, and there are larger differences in 3,840 × 2,160. In the highest resolution, the frame times of the Radeon RX Vega 64 in the Esports games are suddenly four percent better than those of the GeForce GTX 1080. The GeForce RTX 2070 is another twelve percent better. This means that the GeForce RTX 2070 works 17 percent faster than the GeForce GTX 1080 in the measurement series, which is an unusual amount.
Apex Legends – 1,920 × 1,080
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 590
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 570
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
Apex Legends – 2,560 × 1,440
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Apex Legends – 3,840 × 2,160
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Fortnite – 1,920 × 1,080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 570
Fortnite – 2,560 × 1,440
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Fortnite – 3,840 × 2,160
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Overwatch – 1,920 × 1,080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX 590
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 570
Overwatch – 2,560 × 1,440
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Overwatch – 3,840 × 2,160
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Rainbow Six: Siege – 1,920 × 1,080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 570
Rainbow Six: Siege – 2,560 × 1,440
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Rainbow Six: Siege – 3,840 × 2,160
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
AMD Radeon VII
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
On the next page: volume, temperature, power consumption and a closing word
Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420
Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420