Categories: Technology

AMD CPUs Become a Prisoner of the Ring Bus?

The latest research by AnandTech shed new light on why AMD processors may have a problem with increasing the number of cores at the moment. Everything apparently crashes on the bus used.

A bus is a physical and digital connection between specific internal components of (in this case) a processor. In the AMD Ryzen 5000 based on the Zen 3 architecture, there are CCD (Compute Complex Die), i.e. a special type of computing matrices. It is in them that the eight processor cores are connected with, among others 32 MB shared level 3 cache and IFOP using Bi-Directional Ring Bus.

Also read: AMD is still working on Frontier. This will be the most efficient supercomputer

This makes each element connected in a kind of circle in which information circulates in both directions at the same time. This does not sound bad, but in reality communication between the two most distant elements requires going through the “half of the other” elements. This, in turn, leads to an increase in latency and that is why Intel, among others, abandoned this bus 11 years ago in favor of a mesh topology.

Also read: AMD is preparing the Radeon RX 6900 XTX to fight the RTX 3090?

The mesh topology is a more advanced ring bus, but with additional direct connectivity points between components. AMD, in turn, passed a small rendez-vois with its even more advanced variation, because it consists in direct connection of all elements with each other with Ryzen Zen 2 processors with 4-core CCX blocks. Finally, in the current generation of Ryzen, AMD has opted for an 8-core CCX in the form of a CCD with an internal two-way ring bus.

CCX vs CCD

Also read: Radeons RX 7000 will reach for cores from RX 6000? AMD will play recycling

Coming to conclusions, it now looks like AMD may have to ditch the ring bus in the future in order to be able to increase the number of processor cores per CCD block.

HEADING

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420