Categories: Hardware

PCIe 5.0 SSDs will require a cooling system to curb high temperatures

The first SSD drives were promoted as being much more energy efficient than HDDs. As the speeds increased with each generation, so did the power requirements, and this gradually generated much more heat. Some high-end Gen 4 units already benefit greatly from dedicated cooling systems, and we’re likely to see that trend become more widespread with future SSDs.

Cooling of some sort will be a must as PCIe 5 devices begin to hit the market.

Sebastien Jean, technical director of Phison, analyzed the situation in an interview:

“As the speed continues to increase with each new generation, our challenge will continue to be managing heat,” said Jean.

As a general rule of thumb, Jean points out that each additional GB/s of speed offered by an SSD requires approximately one additional watt of power. “You know you need more cooling when you benchmark your SSD and the performance starts at 7GB/s and then suddenly goes to 500MB/s. When you see that quick drop, it’s very likely that the SSD has entered a sleep mode. thermal throttlingJean added.

One way to reduce power requirements is to reduce the number of NAND channels used by the SSD.

“In practical terms, eight lanes are no longer needed to clutter the Gen4 and even Gen5 PCIe interface. You can potentially saturate the host interface with four NAND channels, and reducing the number of back-end channels reduces total SSD power typically by 20 to 30 percent,” said Jean.

Another method is to use a smaller process node, for example going from 16nm to 7nm. Phison points out that smaller process nodes can operate at higher frequencies with lower voltage. The smaller node units also require less power to cycle the transistors, further reducing the power used and ultimately the heat generated.

Despite the improvements, Jean said he expects to see passive heatsinks with Gen 5 devices. “Eventually, we’ll also need a fan that pushes air directly over the heatsink,” he added.

While not ideal, passive/active cooling is feasible with most configurations. However, laptops and small desktops may present more of a challenge due to their size.

Miners Hashrate

Recent Posts

Mining RTX 3070 at NiceHash: Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption

Mining on RTX 3070. Overclocking, tuning, profitability, consumption: If you are interested in finding more…

6 months ago

Mining GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super: Overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with GTX 1660, 1660 Ti, 1660 Super. Overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparisons - If…

6 months ago

Mining RTX 2070 and 2070 Super: Overclocking, profitability, consumption

Mining with RTX 2070 and 2070 Super. Overclocking, profitability, consumption, comparison What the RTX 2070…

6 months ago

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption

Mining with RTX 3060, 3060 Ti. Limitations, overclocking, settings, consumption, profitability, comparison Let's look at…

6 months ago

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A Sapphire – test: 2.8 GHz++ are not an issue

Alphacool Eisblock Aurora Acryl GPX-A (2022) with Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure in…

6 months ago

Corporate Crypto Strategies 4.0: Leading with Bitcoin Expertise

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, Bitcoin has emerged as a pivotal asset. With…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420