ROG STRIX RX 480 8G Review: Controller, UVD, VCE and Watt | Polaris Graphics Card

ROG STRIX RX480 8G GAMING

3. Results of performance tests and analysis

In the diagrams, the results of testing video cards on NVIDIA GPUs are highlighted in green, and on AMD GPUs they are reflected in the usual red color scheme of this manufacturer. To highlight the performance of the Radeon RX 480, we chose a bold red fill color. Let’s add that in the charts in each quality mode, the test results are sorted from top to bottom in descending order of the cost of video cards.

3DMark

In almost all 3DMark test scenes, the performance of video cards confirms their cost, clearly positioning the products from top to bottom. Only in the Time Spy test is the density of results higher. The AMD Radeon RX 480 is in the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 level, slightly behind its direct competitor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 and significantly ahead of the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming. The performance of the Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X is clearly beyond the reach of the heroine of today’s article even when overclocked.

Crysis 3

Crysis 3 showed us a different image.

Here the AMD Radeon RX 480 isn’t so self-confident anymore, getting the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 from the previous NVIDIA lineup. The new element feature on the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming isn’t impressive at all, and the difference with the Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri- X is too big. Unfortunately, there can be no conflict with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060.

metro light past

As a reminder, we tested Metro: Last Light with and without Advanced PhysX enabled.

However, disabling Advanced PhysX did not help today’s AMD video cards – the competitors turned out to be much stronger. The AMD Radeon RX 480’s advantage over the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming here ranges from 16 to 28%, and the Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X backlog ranges from 2 to 24%.

Heroes Company 2

In Company of Heroes 2, the alignment of forces is not much different from Metro: Last Light – video cards based on AMD GPUs are inferior to their competitors based on NVIDIA chips.

Read This Now:   Radeon RX 480 or GeForce GTX 1060 - which graphics card to choose?

Even the AMD Radeon RX 480 lost to the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 Here, what can we say about the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, which in turn successfully fights with the Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X?

battlefield 4

The situation in Battlefield 4 is worse for video cards with AMD GPUs.

The AMD Radeon RX 480 was only able to show a slight advantage over the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming, but even the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 was too tough for it, let alone the GeForce GTX 1060.

thief

Things are much better for AMD in the game Thief, which uses the Mantle API.

Although there are no obvious performance gaps, the AMD Radeon RX 480 only competes with the ASUS GeForce GTX 970, slightly ahead of the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 not only convincingly defeats the AMD Radeon RX 480, but is also able to afford the more expensive Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X.

Elite Sniper III

The results of testing video cards in the game Sniper Elite III largely depend on the quality mode, that is, the activation of SSAA 4.0.

However, even here we cannot consider the performance of the AMD Radeon RX 480 convincing, since the advantage over the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming is absolutely insignificant, and there is no need to talk about competing with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060.

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

Here, the performance of the AMD Radeon RX 480 is 4-26% higher than that of the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming, although this applies only to a resolution of 1920 x 1080, since at a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the new product is ahead of its predecessor At just a few frames per second, the minimum FPS for the AMD Radeon RX 480 is slightly lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 is far ahead of both, as is the Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X.

Grand Theft Auto V

In Grand Theft Auto V, we can see the image that has already become familiar in today’s tests.

However, unlike previous benchmarks, the AMD Radeon RX 480 managed to outperform the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 in no anti-aliasing modes and doesn’t lag far behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 with Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X. When running the MSAA4x, we’re only talking about the battle against the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 and the edge over the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming. No more unfortunately.

Read This Now:   Mining: Nvidia Geforce GTX 1060 6 & 3 GB - Hashrate | Best Settings (Whattomine)

Dirt Rally

In the dirt-road racing simulator, the AMD Radeon RX 480 is on par with the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 and slightly behind it the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060. As for the big difference with the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming, it is most likely not due to the driver optimization of this video card, or Feature of the latest game patches with Radeon R9 3xx video cards.

Batman: Arkham Knight

Batman: Arkham Knight was created with the support of NVIDIA, it actively uses the graphics technologies of this company, but this fact did not prevent video cards based on AMD GPUs from performing confidently in these tests.

Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 480 once again lost to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, but this time not as much as in previous games. And the difference with the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming here is very good 24-33%.

Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege

Rainbow Six: Siege was the first game where the AMD Radeon RX 480 beat the Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X to finally rival the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060.

Its difference with the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming is also impressive, reaching 48% in one of the quality modes. In addition, the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 was finally defeated by a good margin. In general, the first game that justified the release of the AMD Radeon RX 480. Unfortunately, the holiday did not last long – already in Rise of the Tomb Raider everything is back to square one.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Read This Now:   GTX 1080 Ti VS 1080 Mining: Overclocking | Profitability (Ether) | Power consumption

It seems that support for Rise of the Tomb Raider API DirectX 12 would help the AMD Radeon RX 480, but the results suggest otherwise – the new product still lost out to its main competitor.

But in non-Anti-aliasing modes, the AMD Radeon RX 480 is quite confidently ahead of the ASUS STRIX R9 380X Gaming, and when AA is activated, the frame rate is very low, and it makes no difference to choose which of these two video cards is.

Far primitive

Far Cry Primal puts video cards very clearly in terms of performance, based on their cost, especially in the most resource-intensive quality mode.

The AMD Radeon RX 480 is 14-23% faster than the gaming ASUS STRIX R9380X in this game, and 8-11% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060.

Tom Clancy is splitting

With the exception of the abnormally high scores for the Sapphire NITRO R9 390 OC Tri-X, the performance of the rest of the graphics cards in Tom Clancy’s The Division is not far from uncommon.

However, we note that in this game the AMD Radeon RX 480 lags behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 by a few percent.

Assassin

Hitman’s latest release is a celebration on the red streets of AMD, as in this game the GPUs powered by Polaris and Grenada have managed to outpace their Pascal and Maxwell 2.0 GPU competitors.

We add that on the ASUS GeForce GTX 970 with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels using the maximum anti-aliasing mode, the test ended with an error, so there is no result for this video card in this quality mode.

Let’s supplement the generated charts with a summary table of test results with the displayed average u200bu200 and the minimum value of the number of frames per second for each video card.

In addition to gaming tests, today we will present the test results of two competing video cards in the CompuBench CL 1.5 benchmark.



AMD Radeon RX 480 4GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420