The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X would be better than the Intel Core i3-10300 in 3DMark Time Spy

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X it can already be seen in several benchmarks, the samples to the reviewers arrived this past week and the leaks are raining … This time it is the 3DMark Time Spy.

Contents hide

1 What do you think of all this?

1.1 Related posts:

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-core, 8-wire processing at a Base / Turbo frequency of 3.80 / 4.30 GHz with 18 MB of Level 3 cache and a TDP of 65W.

R3 3300X (3.8 / 4.34) VS i3-10300 (3.7 / 4.3)
** (reported clock)
TIME SPY pic.twitter.com/BWW7QULiob
– APISAK (@TUM_APISAK) April 24, 2020

The Intel Core i3-10300It also has 4 cores and 8 processing threads but at a Base / Turbo frequency of 3.70 / 4.30 GHz with 6 MB. We have no idea of its TDP, but we do know its price, which was leaked a few weeks ago at a cost of $ 160, plus tax, compared to $ 120 for AMD's CPU.

Read This Now: Radeon Super Resolution (RSR): AMD FSR Goes Into Drivers To Hit Hundreds Of Games | CES 2022

With all this the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X It offers a score of 5395 points compared to 5221 points for the Intel Core i3-10300, or in other words, AMD's CPU is 3.3% faster.

We do not understand Intel's strategy well, I imagine that they have an AS under the command and for now they do not mind losing market, something that when it is time they will recover by far? And that way they will have the crown again …