AMD Radeon RX Vega performs better than Geforce GTX 1080 in 3DMark 11

At the end of June, AMD launched the new Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, which was the first to come equipped with the Vega 10 graphics circuit. Several media have taken the opportunity to purchase a graphics card and give a first taste of the gaming performance, which lies between Geforce GTX 1080 and GTX 1070.

Now AMD’s graphics card with the ID loop 687F: C1 can be found in the database for 3DMark 11. The same loop has previously been used in various leaks, but also by AMD themselves when they gave the media a first demonstration of Vega in December 2016. Of all judging by this, this is the top model in the company’s upcoming Radeon RX Vega series.

Grafikpoäng i 3DMark 11 (Performance)

Graphics card

3DMark 11 (Performance)

Difference

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1080 Ti

38,389 points

+20,4%

AMD Radeon RX Vega (687F:C1)

31,873 points

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1080

27,618 points

-13,3%

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070

23,608 points

-25,9%

Read This Now:   AMD publishes images on the Polaris 11 and Polaris 10 graphics circuits

The results show that the graphics card by a good margin beats Nvidia’s Geforce GTX 1070 and also passes GTX 1080, which Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with the same graphics circuit could not afford. However, Nvidia’s worsting model GTX 1080 Ti has what appears to be an impregnable advantage in this particular test.

Specifications: – AMD Radeon RX Vega

RX Vega

Vega FE

RX 580

R9 Fury X

Technical

14 nm

14 nm

14 nm

28 nm

Circuit

Vega 10

Vega 10

Polaris 20

Fiji XT

Circuit surface

484 mm2

484 mm2

232 mm2

596 mm2

Transistors

?

?

5.7 billion

8.9 billion

Architecture

NCU

NCU

GCN 4.0

GCN 3.0

Streamprocessorer

4 096 st.

4 096 st.

2 304 st.

4 096 st.

Texture units

256 st.

256 st.

144 st.

256 st.

Raster units

64 st.

64 st.

32 st.

64 st.

Bass frequency

?

1 382 MHz

1 257 MHz

Turbo frequency

1 630 MHz

1 600 MHz

1 340 MHz

1 050 MHz

Computational power

13 353 GFLOPS

13 107 GFLOPS

6 175 GFLOPS

8 602 GFLOPS

Memory bus

2 048-bit

2 048-bit

256-bit

4 096-bit

Memory amount

8 GB HBM2

16 GB HBM2

4/8 GB GDDR5

4 GB HBM

Memory frequency

1 890 MHz

1 890 MHz

8 000 MHz

1 000 MHz

Memory bandwidth

484 GB/s

484 GB/s

256 GB/s

512 GB/s

Power supply

?

8+8-pin

8-pin

8+8-pin

TBP

?

300 W

185 W

275 W

Read This Now:   Asus releases Ares II with dual Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition

The database also shows further details about the performance, where AMD managed to get an additional 30 MHz on the graphics circuit over the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. The fact that, in contrast to this, it manages to outperform the Geforce GTX 1080 by such a good margin also indicates that the RX Vega has an easier time maintaining a higher clock frequency under load. This could be attributed to a better cooling solution.

Furthermore, AMD’s previous statement that Vega for games will have 4 and 8 GB of graphics memory is also confirmed, as the listing in the database shows 8 GB for 687F: C1. This is lower than the computationally oriented Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, which is equipped with twice the amount of 16 GB.

Whether the performance figures match the final product is difficult to predict, as polishing the drivers can lift Vega further. Another possibility is that AMD is turning up the clock frequencies further, but the already sky-high power consumption in the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition at 1,600 MHz speaks against this.

Read This Now:   Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 Ti prestandatestas i 3DMark

► Read all articles about #AMD Vega

The remaining question marks about the AMD Radeon RX Vega, including its performance, are expected to be answered at the Siggraph 2017 graphics conference on July 30.

Source: Wccftech


Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (1) in /home/gamefeve/bitcoinminershashrate.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5420